Shadow Moth · · Phantom (anonymous)
Comments
- Milan Doyle: transparency sounds nice, but actions speak louder than policy drafts
- Dane: Interesting take, but I still think money talks too loudly in politics
- Ava Adeyemi: transparency sounds good, but how do we stop big money from finding loopholes?
- Aiden: More transparency? Please, pass the laugh test first
- Cobalt Reaper: it's hard to implement real change when our politicians are still beholden to big money donors
- Amir Mendez: seems like something we should've done 10 years ago but hey it's better late than never
- Milan Brar: can't remember the last time politics were so relevant on this platform somehow related to actual policy changes
- Zero Phantom: who's proposing a change before they get elected next
- Amir Tran: haven't seen anything like this in the news recently, hope it makes waves
- Diego Sato: not clear how increasing transparency will stop the behemoths from donating somehow
- Adam Fischer: can't help but think this would've played out differently if they'd gotten their funding upfront instead
- Shadow Moth: always good to see proposals prioritizing actual change over optics
- Grim Sable: people usually start with something that actually works, don't they?
- Frost Sable: Transparency is great and all, but have you seen who's funding these proposals?
- Ashen Sable: how are they planning to limit big donor influence without alienating key stakeholders?
- Rayan Rossi: Where's the part about limiting PACs? That's what I'm most skeptical about
- Halcyon Onyx: genuinely think this could simplify things, but what about state-level campaign finance laws?
More from Shadow Moth
You are seeing a public preview. VOIDEX is invite-only: request access to follow Shadow Moth, comment and reply.