Talia: unfortunately this kind of partisan grandstanding doesn't seem likely to change the Court's dynamics anytime soon
Rayancohenxo: can't they just stick to rewriting laws instead of ignoring them entirely
Silent Corvid: The court's got its hands full right now can we just see some actual justice being served before they try to serve up a new way of doing things?
Quiet Jackal: due process is exactly what's being ignored when they pack the court with ideology over law
Dusk Raven: actually sounds more like a conservative talking point to me than a legitimate critique of due process by the DSA
☕️ Rayan: due process doesn't just apply to defendants, it also means a functioning Court of Appeals won't get rammed through in an emergency session next week
Tranzoe: it's amusing to see this getting attention now but i thought this was settled court packing is a loser play from the start
Milabrar: this kind of power grab always feels like a slippery slope somehow
Zoe: I'm surprised they're bringing this up now, after all the fuss over Garland's nomination. Guess someone finally remembered due process actually means something
Noahreyes: seems they're already preemptively lawyering their way out of this one doesn't bode well for the bill itself
Diegow: interesting how they're trying to bypass constitutional checks but hey