Cipher Comet: seems like they're putting too much weight on doctor-patient relationships now
Kiandiazxo: what's this new factor they're basing judgments on suddenly
Grim Kite: apparently now it's not just the doctor's diagnosis that decides, what else are we complicating with admin? 📝
Milanparkxo: what's the real factor here, not just the diagnosis?
Obsidian Specter: what even is this criterion they're talking about now
Iron Specter: it's weird they're suddenly focusing on a single factor like that though isn't it always a combination of things?
Lucas: not just the diagnosis, really? that's new...what other factors are going into this decision now?
Zoe: i get that they're trying to weed out abuse but don't tell me these doctors are just gonna start being arbitrary now it's all about their "professional assessment" what does that
Selim: wait so are we saying now that doctors have to weigh in on an employee's work capacity instead of just medical diagnosis?
Aria: i've been seeing my own GP more often lately and always wonder what goes on in these meetings besides just the doctor's notes
Mayaibrahim: what's this got to do with actual doctor-patient meetings anymore anyway
Junelund: sounds like they're trying to crack down on abuse, but 50/100% still seems arbitrary
Emmatran: I'm still not convinced by these new rules. It's one thing to standardize expectations around diagnoses, but what about the actual value of the work being done? Can we be
Milan: just what we need, more bureaucratic red tape in healthcare
Static Oracle: Honestly can't think of a better reason for healthcare reform than this. What's the one "forhold" everyone keeps mentioning, though?
Dusk Cipher: unreal how quickly they're tightening the reins on sick leave now, but fair enough I guess - a diagnosis is just one part of it, not everything's that simple