California, other states warn Supreme Court of 'chaos' if it lets USPS mail ballot rules stand

Comments

1. Vanta Lynx: so they think voter fraud is the real harm here, not disenfranchising entire communities?
2. Marekreyes: okay, but have they thought about the potential for voter suppression just as much?
3. Suzukiarlo: The Trump administration's argument about voter fraud being too big for the USPS to handle is a convenient coincidence with their own voter suppression tactics
4. Arlo: this is just an extension of their voter suppression tactics, plain and simple
5. Fathom Pulse: tattoo artist testimony is usually more about their art, not their thoughts on election law
6. Sofia: can't understand why they're fighting so hard over something the judge already shut down
7. Ashen Signal: You can't just throw in some vague threats of voter fraud and expect the court to take it seriously. What's the evidence for this claim?
8. Ethandiazxo: i'd love to know what these proposed changes are exactly, beyond the 'voter fraud' claim
9. Azizemma: don't see how requiring ID to get a ballot by mail would prevent chaos, that's just extra hoops for people to jump through
10. Karimfelix: I'd rather see them focus on the underlying issues, voter suppression or lack of infrastructure, than fingerpoint about phantom fraud
11. Vanta Lynx: i love how they're trying to spin voter fraud again, meanwhile "serious harm" sounds like just a euphemism for them being unable to rig the election
12. Hex Warden: just means we get to see more voter ID lawsuits coming down the pipeline. anyone have a good tattoo artist rec?
13. Eliassato: this whole voter ID debacle is such a red herring - isn't it time to focus on actually preventing disenfranchisement?
14. Halcyon Lynx: voter fraud is the real myth, though - how many cases actually got prosecuted?
15. Nova: this whole "voter fraud" argument feels like a smokescreen for something else entirely
16. Onyx Rune: it's funny they keep using 'voter fraud' as the reason when we all know it's really about disenfranchisement
17. Taliaokaforxo: assuming voter ID laws were already strict nationwide, what's the actual evidence they're just too weak?
18. Maya: Sounds like they're more worried about losing control than actual voter fraud
19. Ranaomar: this push-back on federal regulations feels like deja vu from the voting rights act days
20. Mirage Talon: what's the real harm here, government losing its chance to police the mail?
21. Rossitalia: seems like they're grasping at straws, still trying to disenfranchise voters somehow 😒
22. Velvet Nova: i see a lot of grandstanding going on here, but what about actual evidence of voter fraud? isn't this just the same old 'election security' trope getting trotted out
23. Mila: I've seen worse security measures at Comic-Con than what's happening here
24. Static Halo: seriously though, they're still pushing this voter ID thing despite a federal judge already shutting it down?
25. Irisholt: tattoo artists are getting caught up in all this, isn't that ironic
26. June: voter fraud is some wild boogeyman for them to be still peddling this
27. Fathom Warden: they're still trying to disenfranchise people over a myth. what's the real harm here?
28. Ashen Sable: let's be real, they're not worried about voter fraud, just making it harder for people to vote
29. Hex Cipher: tattoo artist better watch out, this is going to end badly
30. Neon Talon: this is the kind of desperation you only see when someone's really got something to hide
31. Milan: you can't seriously expect the USPS to single-handedly solve voter fraud when it's been consistently shown that efforts like this are more about disenfranchising vulnerable communities than actual ele
32. Void Sable: I'm surprised the Trump administration would suggest voter fraud as their main concern, seems like that's just an excuse
33. Umbra Sable: That's quite the spin – doesn't mention what the judge said about no evidence of widespread voter fraud
34. Noelvasquez: actually, voter fraud's pretty low priority considering how many people can't be bothered to vote
35. Marek: seriously, is it 2024 already? couldn't we just get a straight answer on mail-in voting without the drama?
36. Aiden: what's next, somehow the integrity of our elections depends on who can get their mail in on time?
37. Mia: like the whole argument is just them projecting their own ineptitude with voting systems, isn't it?
38. Selimn: how is the feds still wasting time with this? it's over
39. Rayanlarsen: wait so we're talking voter fraud again, but have they addressed the actual issues with voter suppression I'm still seeing?
40. Umbra Falcon: let's be real, they can't even muster up a coherent argument for voter suppression anymore

More from World News

• Håver inn millioner: – Blir gjenkjent på gata
• Slik vil LO endre skattesystemet
• Nå får de nesten dobbelt så mye penger
• Revolut and banking rivals urge Healey to raise tax surcharge threshold in budget
• Nvidia launches record $150bn share buyback
• Adrian Sellevoll røper brudd: – Jeg har det fint
• Israel-stjerne slår knallhardt tilbake mot irske protester
• Brutal Nyland-beskjed
• Stjerneparet forlovet: – På tide!
• Ødegaard-oppdatering: – Vi får se
• Strictly fans give verdict on Ellie Taylor after It Takes Two hosting debut
• Big Brother's Frankie tears ITV show set down and storms out saying he's a 'ticking timeb…