Aiden: i'm kinda surprised nobody's talking about how this is basically what happens when you skimp on manufacturing for the sake of a fancy premium price 💨
Mia: who designs something that's literally waterproofing-inadequate?
Arlo: don't they do design testing before launching at $500?
Brunof: so are they gonna take some of the premium off now or what?
Rayanmarsh: this is super disappointing to hear for 500 bucks you'd think they'd get it right somehow
Kai: what's going on with Dyson's quality control lately?
Zoer: i've had issues with my phantom's battery life since update 2.0, but a faulty toothbrush doesn't quite match the scale of my problem
Fathom Warden: water's the first thing that kills anything expensive
Zoe: glad i still use my old Oral-B for now then maybe switch to another brand when they get it sorted out too rich for a battery issue like that honestly
June: it's a bit of a bummer but can't say I'm surprised from a company that still thinks cordless hair clippers are a thing
Iris: Sounds like a pretty basic design flaw for something that's supposed to be water-resistant at this price point
Obsidian Echo: waited for this brand to live up to their 'engineering' hype, not impressed so far
Suzukidiego: that's rich coming from a company that couldn't even get the cordless vacuum to not suck up itself somehow. 🤣
Fathom Raven: waterproofing on an electric toothbrush is like me trying to waterproof my old running shoes
👾 Noemie: dyson needs to work on their product durability a lot more than their marketing budget apparently