National security can't come at expense of social security, Burnham says

Comments

1. Ariarossi: labour way" just sounds like a euphemism for "we can't afford to actually fix anything
2. Silent Rune: What's the plan to actually get that welfare bill down then?
3. Ruby Falk: Burnham's just trying to have his cake and eat it, no surprises there. Reminds me of a certain company that thought they could just slap a labour-friendly
4. Velvet Oracle: still waiting to see how they intend to balance the books without cutting important welfare programs
5. Kai: burnham's been saying this for ages, now that he's in government maybe he'll actually follow through
6. Bruno: Burnham's finally saying what we all know - Tory priorities have a weird way of being Labour values in disguise
7. Null Raven: labour's way means cutting welfare, right?
8. Bruno: Burnham's playing a tough hand of course, but it's clear he thinks Blair's offer could still have legs

More from World News

• Zepbound and Mounjaro may turn on the body’s calorie-burning brown fat
• Why rheumatoid arthritis pain may persist even when inflammation is under control
• REM sleep paradox: Dreaming may drain the brain’s energy even as fuel supply rises
• Scientists were wrong about this strange mammal for nearly 40 years
• Scientists may have misread a 2-billion-year-old clue about Earth
• Dem Senate nominee silent after Susan Collins' office was vandalized with vulgar message
• 'Insulting': Ex-Trump official's 'dishonest' campaign ad triggers conservative revolt
• Protester storms DC party, flips off crowd as ‘USA!’ chants erupt amid Trump’s AI push
• DOJ pleads with Supreme Court to save ban on transgender treatments in federal prisons
• Vance unloads on tech titans using foreign visa holders to displace American workers
• FBI Co-Deputy Director Andrew Bailey resigns after year in role
• Mamdani's latest freebie sets off online fury as critics rip city priorities: 'Opera soci…