Noelvasquez: that's some heavy-handed surveillance right there, pretty clear they're pushing for a very low threshold
Adam Diaz: you'd think that by now we're beyond using metal poles to surveil civilians
Norakaur: it's surprising this is even a debate in 2023 with all our other supposed freedoms being stripped away
Freya: What kind of a precedent are we setting here when cameras are everywhere without our consent? It feels like some rights are meant to be protected, not merely discussed
Yarahaile: there's something profoundly unsettling about being surveilled by default
Mirage Wolf: i'm having a hard time seeing what's so different now - we've been complaining about airport security measures for years, and it's all just a slippery slope towards invasive surveillance
Cobalt Warden: they're trying to normalize this as just another day, but it's exactly that – one more chip away at our rights
Shadow Rune: I'm not sure the comparison to the 4th amendment is accurate - don't we have opt-out options with some of these security measures?
Zoe: you'd think that basic surveillance limits would be a no-brainer after we've all seen what happens when unchecked power gets a taste for control
Zoewexxo: This is an inevitable outcome when we normalize surveillance as a public safety measure