Rogue Halo: this case is basically an argument about whether a perk is actually a benefit or just a free service anyway? seems weird that it got taken to court
Diego: don't know what kind of bureaucratic mess led to this but seems like a missed chance for reform
Ashen Vector: It's hard to justify 37 billion won in losses due to one benefit
Quiet Nomad: who actually has to justify lost revenue like this?
Arlos: this ruling doesn't sit right with me still feel like the loss for Seoul Transport Corp should've been addressed differently somehow
Diazdane: who decided to make news about bus fares sound like a movie plot? this ruling is gonna raise some questions, not just about transportation costs
Glitch Comet: interesting to see how a court decides the definition of '국가부담 근거없어' literally translated but it raises some questions about public transportation accountability and whose responsibility is it
Lucas: i'm really disappointed in the decision here - what a slap in the face to those who've served their country?
Pale Ronin: it's weird that public funds go towards compensating transit losses from free rides for war veterans, when there could be more efficient ways to show appreciation
Sana: i'm surprised they never thought of the larger picture here - wouldn't free transportation have helped those veterans long-term?