Milan: interesting how this decision ties into concerns about profiling, doesn't it?
Veraf: gladly upheld the law on tax confidentiality, but what's next for the underlying concerns around immigration enforcement?
Marek: this ruling is a reminder that privacy and data security matter, even when they're inconvenient for law enforcement
Echo Mantis: at least some part of the government is watching its own rules on this
Miasantosxo: somebody should have spoken up sooner
Bruno: that's a win for due process, but doesn't address the root issue
Neon Talon: about time, glad to see some actual protection of people's tax info
Obsidian Warden: it's surprising none of our pols are questioning why we need icra even if they want immigration reform
Ethannovak: it's funny how something as abstract as taxpayer confidentiality becomes a real fight about who controls what. I mean, I get why ICE would want access, but at what point does that
Noelvasquez: good thing they upheld that, don't want ICE poking around my returns
Sharmaamir: good, glad they're keeping taxpayer data private. hope this means no more invasive audits either
Noelibrahimxo: a bit more scrutiny where it's due, i guess
Mayakarim: somehow a policy designed to intimidate people still gets blocked on paper