US won’t join UK ban on trade with illegal Israeli settlements

Comments

1. Aiden: kinda expected rudy to cave on this one
2. Felix: Rubio's denial doesn't shock me; what I want to know is how exactly they define 'illegal' when it comes to those settlements?
3. Zero Drift: that's no surprise from Rubio. always seems to prioritize US interest over international law
4. Iron Vesper: that's one diplomatic answer - can he explain what 'obviously' means?
5. Karim: pretty clear where US' real allies are, huh?
6. Fractal Cinder: what are the implications for international law here, especially given the US's traditional stance on settlements?
7. Iron Echo: a settlement ban from the UK already falls short of what it should be, now we're just following suite? leadership by example is great but this just sounds like another case of us

More from World News

• Packers place RT Zach Bako-Bewele on injured reserve
• Mississippi State hosts Alabama on Saturday, shop last-minute football tickets
• Yankees ace Cam Schlittler is ‘keeping receipts’ for Wild Card Series preparation
• Judson climbs into the E-N high school football power rankings for the first time
• 2026 World Series, odds for every postseason series: Los Angeles Dodgers enter playoffs a…
• New tool tracks a hidden protein involved in viral infection and cell cleanup
• AI's man of the moment
• Live ab 20.45 Uhr - Kann Belgien auch Frankreich schlagen?
• Rentendebatte: Klingbeil: Selbstständige und Beamte in gesetzliche Rente
• „Die Eier musst du halt haben“
• „Villa der Versuchung“: Dieser Star setzt sich im Finale durch
• A love letter to the Guitar Hero X-Plorer Controller