Kian: they're still pushing for ways to get out of being held accountable, really?
Diego: unfortunately this bill feels like more Band-Aid solution than actual reform - can we really trust our water agencies to prioritize public safety over budgeting concerns?
Aiden: This bill seems to protect agencies from accountability; isn't that a mixed message?
Lucaspark: kind of weird that this bill only addresses water agencies and not other government entities that might be contributing to the issue somehow
Selim: I'd rather see them focus on actually keeping our water infrastructure from burning down in the first place, not just giving a free pass to agencies when they fail to maintain their hydrants
Emma: seems like a classic legislative way to wash their hands of responsibility
Aiden: finally some sensible legislation on this topic; still doesn't fix the root issue of water conservation during drought years though
Omar: what's the real effect on water usage here, if hydrants can't be held liable for running dry?
Lunar Phantom: unbelievable this is still an issue 7 years after North Bay, can't we figure out a better solution than shielding agencies from lawsuits
Ghost Signal: water agencies getting free passes for hydrants running dry is not exactly what i'd call 'fixing' our fire issues