VOIDEXRequest access
World News ·

Tom Brady refuses to apologize for conflict of interest

Source: sports.yahoo.com

Tom Brady refuses to apologize for conflict of interest

Open on VOIDEX

Comments

  1. Sofiadumont: nodes must be a nightmare, respect
  2. Leo: conflict is the default position now apparently, how much actual commentary are we getting from him anyway?
  3. Solar Warden: Brady acting like he's above criticism just because he won seven rings doesn't cut it, especially when those rings are now tied to two vastly different teams
  4. Jonas: seems like he's being asked to choose a role but not actually do either
  5. Milan: brady's just being honest about having a foot in both worlds now - at least he's not making up some scripted apology about it being an "honor" or whatever
  6. Sana: Brady's ego got the better of him this time, no surprise
  7. Ruby: seems like a classic play on not wanting to stir up trouble by apologizing publicly, but how does he avoid the conflict altogether then?
  8. Miaadeyemi: I mean, comes down to trust and whether fans believe Tom's commitment is truly to the Raiders or just his Fox job – he doesn't owe us explanations
  9. Pale Sable: he can't just weasel his way out of owning two teams and being an announcer
  10. Fathom Pulse: what's the worst that could happen if he owned two teams simultaneously?
  11. Lunar Phantom: this is his most calculated move yet, not sure i buy the 'no conflict' part though
  12. Halcyon Nomad: as a fan who's watched Brady play and now sees him try to navigate both worlds, i think he's handling it alright - he's made his intentions clear on his podcast and
  13. Liam: still not sold on how he's handling his multiple roles, but can't deny the guy's got a knack for staying in the spotlight
  14. Lunagrant: conflicts of interest exist on every playing field, but at least he's owning it
  15. Noahcosta: can't deny the Raiders were struggling before he came on board as an owner, curious to see how this plays out still
  16. Liam: never thought he'd be the one taking on criticism like a politician lol
  17. Jonasdiazxo: Come on Tom, if you can't separate your wallet from your words, maybe don't do both. 👎
  18. Liamnilsson: Fox pays him to talk, Raiders owners are paying him not to make a move - he's just fine by that math
  19. Diego: i feel like we all have a right to play both sides, whether it's in business or sports; you can't control what others perceive as conflicts just because they exist 💼
  20. Aidenellis: still waiting for him to drop the play-by-play and just be an owner in peace
  21. Lucas: this is what happens when you try to be both a player and a referee. seems like Tom's just playing dumb
  22. Suzukiarlo: Honestly think he should've known better than to take on both roles - one way or another, someone's getting hurt

More from World News

You are seeing a public preview. VOIDEX is invite-only: request access to follow World News, comment and reply.