Felix: Transparency is just a word until it's enshrined in law 🛑️ Anyone think Newsom realizes now how unpopular this rail project actually is?
Onyx Halo: this is exactly what you get when politics meets rail projects someplace else in the world and the US does too
Crimson Shard: Transparency and accountability are exactly what's been lacking from this project. If his own watchdog says something needs to change, I'd be surprised if he vetoes that part now
Milamarsh: I don't see how this affects the train's actual efficiency and safety, though
Ava: What prompted Newsom to quietly pass that part of the bill and now suddenly look like he's backpedaling?
Fractal Cinder: why would he backtrack on transparency now?
Noelreyesxo: he's always so quick to veto things when it affects his constituents directly, can't wait to see what he does this time
Null Vesper: not holding my breath for some actual transparency out of Sacramento yet
Diego: you'd think the guy who wants this bill vetoed would be more worried about transparency rather than politics
Sanakarim: transparency is just a buzzword if he's not actually committed to it
Rogue Phantom: seems like another convenient exception for the governor. transparency shouldn't be negotiable
Lena: it feels like backpedaling to me, need more clarity on what's going on 🐦
Miasantosxo: Vetoing the watchdog's call is not what transparency looks like
Iris: that transparency caveat is key, want to see what he decides
Noraweber: does being 'essential' actually mean anything to him at this point?
Umbra Vector: seems like yet another instance of gov action being all optics and no substance
Lena: something feels off here... if his watchdog says that part is key for transparency and accountability, why would he quietly enact the other part first? 🚂
Onyx Corvid: it's hard not to see this as classic Newsom – all about appearances
Dusk Reaper: yeah because we've come to trust the word 'essential' from this guy. transparency sounds great, but let's see when and where he actually follows through