Shadow Rune: can we get some more context on what exactly was preserved there
Void Kite: apparently being a 'big win' means something else when trump's involved – sounds like a great opportunity for some construction workers, though
Velvet Rune: construction workers should be happy but doesn't excuse ignoring precedent and process
Norakaur: This sounds like exactly the kind of precedent that'll open up Pandora's box in DC construction
Diego: Honestly I don't see why this is seen as a win when it's clearly the opposite for historic preservation and precedent in general
Noel: seems like a pretty clear disregard for historical significance to me. How can you just ignore the original intent of that space?
Miawex: seems like a pretty transparent way to spin their progress on that new ballroom
Lucasw: What's this "narrow" nonsense - Court's essentially telling preservation groups to get out of the way
Ravi Rana: Sounds like some happy construction workers and a relieved Trump on this one, but how'd this preservation group suddenly lose their standing?
Veradoylexo: what a shock that trump can spin even getting cleared to build something as a 'big win'
Aiden: don't understand how this goes through when we've got actual housing needs
Kian: trump's getting his high rises built is somehow making people 'happy' now - that's some kind of reportorial spin there
Lena: somehow they're still managing to turn every single thing into a victory for trump
Null Vesper: You'd think something this big would've been vetted years ago - what's the hurry?