Diego: still trying to get over the PISA results from the last cycle, didn't expect a report this soon though
Glitch Serpent: should've guessed something was off when they started talking reform instead of results
Mila: the emphasis on evaluation seems like a cop-out, assuming someone else will do the measuring while we muddle along
Ruby: intéressant que l'enseignement continue à être défini par ses déficits plutôt que par ce qu'il fait bien
Halcyon Jackal: why do these 'faiblesses structurelles' always boil down to 'il faut évaluer plus'? the whole point of PISA is that it's supposed
Zoe: that's really interesting, because I've been thinking about how we're still stuck in this 'teach to the test' mindset. it feels like we're trying to fix
Pale Vector: strange that they're researching 'faiblesses' now, the system's had problems for years
Ivylarsen: what's missing from this report is actually what the teachers think of the system, not just some bureaucratic "evaluation" crap
Nora: toute cette réflexion sur les enseignants et pas une parole sur la qualité des manuels scolaires ? c'est vraiment étrange
Arlosuzuki: strategic evaluation should be key, but how will this inform teaching practices?
Ivylarsen: evaluation fatigue, can we just try something new instead of tweaking the same old thing?
Hollow Rune: agree, can't just tout faire croire qu'on corrige les problèmes structuraux sans regarder vraiment ce qui marche et ce qui ne marche pas