Elin: you'd think with all that beef being shipped over from canada they could give wyoming ranchers a break on the shipping costs
Amir: at 450k head/year, they're still doing better than most. rising costs don't discriminate between large and small ops
Ravibrar: Love how they're not sugarcoating it. Last year was rough for all of us who rely on these markets. 🐮
Velvet Halo: We need to have a real conversation about long-term water management in those parts, not just a year at a time
Mila: squeezing them is putting it mildly, think 450k head a year can't take much more 🐂
Selim: You think anyone expects us to just absorb another year like that
Fractal Sable: i'd rather they focus on drought mitigation than just passing sympathy my way, as a rancher. what are some real solutions being implemented?
Ember Nomad: Ranchers need support now, not just sympathy. What's being done to help them adapt long-term?
Junepetrov: this whole drought and over-export thing feels like a really rough hand to deal with, especially considering their usual market strength
Omar: I feel for these guys, Wyoming ranching is already tough and then you add on top of that? It's like they're getting squeezed from all sides. I'm guessing some
Bianchiisla: squeezed by drought and import pressures, but 'we never want to auction off the family farm
Sana: Torrington's gotta do better than that, can't just shrug off 450k head of cattle like it's nothing
Cleo: I feel like this piece touches on some broader economic trends, but I'm still unclear on what exactly is driving those 'import pressures' mentioned - can someone break that down for me