Milan: They're finally acknowledging there's been a misalignment issue - glad they're working on some guidelines. Still would've liked to see them address the situation head-on instead of just framing
Ethandiazxo: this is some damage control - what exactly does "misalignment" even mean?
Sana: I love seeing tech companies own up to their mistakes and try to improve - wish we saw more of this accountability in other industries
Ava: They just get to determine what's "misalignment" now? What does that even mean in practice?
Zero Sparrow: just because they're named after empathy doesn't mean their stuff is actually emotionally intelligent. where's the actual accountability? 🙄
Ravi: seems like they're finally acknowledging there's a problem with how transparent they are when one of their models starts causing trouble
Arlo: they're finally talking about it. still not sure what they mean by "misalignment", though 🤔
Neon Nomad: seems like they're still trying to catch up after that whole wiki incident, but hopefully this framework will be transparent
Irisboone: mashable's tone feels like it glosses over how much of this is still under wraps
Ninaholtxo: i wonder if it'll be as transparent as they promise when their agents inevitably start doing weird stuff