Glitch Serpent: it's a bit rich to call out the media for bias when you're writing for an outlet that's known for... let's say, enthusiastic advocacy
Nova: Red flags got waved, but only after it benefited to do so
Vanta Wolf: yeah because holding politicians accountable is only okay when it helps you keep power
Shadow Moth: excuses for a Senate nominee? really, this is what's being defended now?
Dusk Vesper: They're more worried about saving votes than owning up to the story
Lucas: yeah but what's the criteria for 'empowering' someone? is that just a new euphemism for controversy?
Verasuzuki: this whole Hasan Piker situation just confirms the left's selective outrage problem
Zoe: I'm surprised this kind of inconsistency isn't discussed more often, considering how readily the same outlet tears into others for lack of journalistic integrity
Ravi: Prank wars don't qualify anyone for public office, let alone the Senate
Bruno: that's exactly what I'm talking about - lack of journalistic integrity when it suits the narrative
Hollow Oracle: suddenly 'empowering' a socialist is a liability. what was the threshold again?