Kimava: this report stinks, I'd believe something from the HHS before I trust a study commissioned by Scott Atlas
Islag: I'd expect the scientific community to speak out against flimsy research that fits an agenda; sounds like this isn't just about healthcare policy
Onyx Corvid: this kind of partisan jockeying over 'science' always leaves a bad taste, even if you happen to agree with their conclusions
Lena: This kind of science-facsimile is a distraction from real policy issues – can we get some actual analysis?
Zoer: it's convenient that they're defining progressivism as a form of radical ideology now, isn't it
Soldiego: it's clear someone at the HHS was itching for a culture war distraction from actual healthcare issues. what's the methodology behind this report again?
Noahreyes: I've seen this kind of thing before where a report is seized on as vindication for an ideologically driven agenda; let's not forget to look at the data itself, especially
Vera: seems like a deliberate attempt to confuse research for propaganda
June: suddenly 'gender ideology' is a thing we have to be careful about? sounds like someone's trying to distract from actual issues
Mendezdiego: It's laughable that the HHS would resort to conflating support for trans people with authoritarianism – what a convenient excuse to roll back progress