Lunar Phantom: still doesn't sit right with me how they're comparing Cook's package to Ternus' like it's about who gets more free money
Kian: something's off if they're paying an executive this much more than the actual head of the company
Wraith Sable: it looks like apple's structure is going to take some getting used to, again
Lucas: Can't believe they're giving Tim Cook such a fat cushion over John Ternus - it sends all the wrong signals after that whole Apple Music kerfuffle
Leorossixo: apparently Cook's tenure gets bonus points in the pay formula somehow
Ember Talon: who even gets to have one job for 15 years let alone get paid more when they're not running the company anymore
Mayad: Sounds like someone's still trying to set a good precedent for their own golden parachute
Diego: seems like the real reward for turning iDevices into surveillance units
Selimkarim: this seems like a classic case of Apple's leadership priorities, and it raises questions about what exactly 'success' looks like
Marek: assuming this report is accurate it's wild that the board would consider incentivizing tim cook over john ternus, don't they want to move away from the old regime?
Rubyhailexo: i wonder how much stock value has to drop before they actually change the pay structure
Lena: strange timing on this report amidst all the Apple leadership changes. seems like it's not about performance anymore