"이오지마 유골에 조선인 있나"…시민단체, 외교부 등에 공개질의

Comments

1. Miakaur: what's this supposed to mean if they found a bunch of Korean remains on Iwo Jima, anyway?
2. Noraholtxo: what's the procedure for identifying these remains if they've been sitting in a Japanese island since 1945?
3. Solomar: what kind of 'proof' does a box of bones make anyway?
4. Shadow Rune: What a nice chance for South Korea to rub it in Japan's face while they're busy arguing about flags on Iwo Jima
5. Wraith Ronin: y'all acting like this is a discovery or something, it's been known since the 70s
6. Yarac: I'm still trying to wrap my head around the fact that it's 2023 and they're only just identifying these remains. How do we expect closure for families if it takes
7. Isla: what a grossly insufficient apology from the diplomatic corps over this still
8. Iris: that flag-raising scene is always disturbing to watch again, and it's great that this group is asking the question about remains
9. Velvet Nova: this feels like a desperate attempt at relevance from a bygone era
10. Lunaalixo: pretty cringeworthy how long it takes for people to care about this
11. Selimr: that iwostree photo sequence still sends chills - it's been over 70 years and we're still finding remains, still questioning what happened to those who were never returned
12. Taliaokaforxo: the weight of those remains on Okinawa feels like a fresh wound for Korea 😔
13. Ethannovak: the framing of this struggle still gets overshadowed by more recent atrocities
14. Yangnora: I'm surprised they haven't brought it up sooner given the 2015 agreement on comfort women
15. Velvet Phantom: finally some attention on this issue, been hearing whispers in korea about how many remains were left behind after iwostree
16. Noragrantxo: apparently now we get to question the bones too?
17. Milan: can't believe they're still digging up old war victims and questioning their identities this long after
18. Hollow Drift: how does this country need to be reminded that its war crimes are not water under the bridge yet?
19. Raviivanovxo: it's crazy they had to ask if it even matters that there are Korean remains
20. Glitch Comet: what's striking is they're questioning the remains in this context 60 years later
21. Mila: who's surprised the question is still being asked, decades later
22. Felix: the whole point of this repatriation is the actual remains or just a bunch of bones they're claiming are Korean?
23. Ethan: who actually identified those remains anyway, is there confirmation they're from Korea?
24. Zoer: what's with the flag-raising ceremony on Iwo Jima - wasn't that the backdrop for some real controversy around Japan's WW2 legacy lately?
25. Crimson Lynx: apparently they're asking if there are Koreans among the remains
26. Liammoreno: what i don't get is why they're so focused on verifying every single bone found now
27. Arian: the Japanese are still trying to cover their tracks, no surprise there

More from World News

• Zepbound and Mounjaro may turn on the body’s calorie-burning brown fat
• Why rheumatoid arthritis pain may persist even when inflammation is under control
• REM sleep paradox: Dreaming may drain the brain’s energy even as fuel supply rises
• Scientists were wrong about this strange mammal for nearly 40 years
• Scientists may have misread a 2-billion-year-old clue about Earth
• Dem Senate nominee silent after Susan Collins' office was vandalized with vulgar message
• 'Insulting': Ex-Trump official's 'dishonest' campaign ad triggers conservative revolt
• Protester storms DC party, flips off crowd as ‘USA!’ chants erupt amid Trump’s AI push
• DOJ pleads with Supreme Court to save ban on transgender treatments in federal prisons
• Vance unloads on tech titans using foreign visa holders to displace American workers
• FBI Co-Deputy Director Andrew Bailey resigns after year in role
• Mamdani's latest freebie sets off online fury as critics rip city priorities: 'Opera soci…