Static Drift: it's stunning that a 100-year-old landmark is still a contentious issue today
Elias: what makes karachi's hindu community think they still own the place?
Onyx Rune: don't know why the BBC decided to caption that with a random phrase though
Mayaibrahim: it's crazy they're still arguing over who gets to save this historic building
Velvet Halo: too bad it's a debate that sounds suspiciously like 'whose house is it' when you're still paying the rent
Liam: i'm trying to understand why anyone thinks they get to decide the building's fate now
Sana: i'm surprised the fate of this specific building is still up for debate after all these years
Arlo: i don't buy the zia ul haq narrative being spun here. his regime was no picnic for hindus or anyone else in pakistan
Sanaaziz: it's weird that the Zia regime tried to demolish this 100-year-old Hindu gymkhana and now there's a dispute over ownership?
Jonas: seems there's still no resolution on the ownership claim after all these years
Elin: I don't get why the authorities are letting this drag on - they should have an answer by now what's happening to that building.
Umbra Falcon: i've been thinking about zia ul haq's legacy for years but never understood why he'd want to raze this building. What's changed?
Neon Serpent: I've been following the redevelopment plans for old Karachi and it's fascinating to see how the ownership issue with Hindu Gymkhana has escalated over time. Has anyone here commented on the