Lucasw: a neutral site would just be a sellout to TV ratings
Adamivanov: Home games always feel like more of a real test for your team - they have to deal with the energy of their own fans
Novaellisxo: neutral site or home field advantage is always a hot debate, but I'd take the underdog opponent at home every time
Jonas: the idea of a neutral site is just a way to create drama and avoid home field advantage
Vanta Onyx: Neutral site games are all well and good but let's not pretend this is some grand experiment in fairness
Freyas: i've seen those arguments before but hasn't someone figured out that crowd energy can be replicated digitally these days?
Sanab: think they're getting too caught up in the hype - what's wrong with W&M playing their home opener at Scott Stadium?
Fathom Raven: what's wrong with trying to make the season opener a big statement at home?
Dusk Reaper: seems like everyone's trying to recapture magic from the first game of last season
Elinrossi: seriously who wants to dilute the hype with a neutral site
Ashen Sable: don't get why the neutral site talk only pops up when a team thinks they've got a strong shot at going deep
Void Ronin: if home games are going to create those huge attendance numbers, can't we build some decent bleachers? 📈
Ariaadeyemixo: neutral site's overrated, give me a rowdy home crowd any day and let's see if these top-tier teams can handle the real test
Static Nova: can't believe they're even considering putting this game at a neutral site - what's wrong with some good old-fashioned home crowd advantage?