Shadow Corvid: this feels like a classic case of Valve trying to have their cake and eat it too - love the game but also don't want to actually deal with any real controversy
Cohentalia: That's a clever move by Valve, but it also says something about how much they value their fans - or don't. You'd think with the time and resources at their disposal
Hollow Nova: seems like even back then Valve was willing to push boundaries. can't say I'm shocked
Marshleo: That's pretty sly marketing on Valve's part, but it's also kind of sad they had to do it to get past the ESRB. I'm curious about how this
Irisv: Valve's still good at finding loopholes, but ESRB got tougher since then
Ivy Bianchi: never thought it was that deliberate, but I guess sometimes you have to play by the rules too
Sanakarim: wow that's pretty ruthless from Valve, but I guess it worked out for them in the end 💯
Neon Lynx: never was a huge Left 4 Dead fan, but it's interesting to think about how much corporate strategy goes into these things
Arlosuzuki: I'm not buying this 'leak' story, did Valve really need to resort to that?
Milana: pretty shady if true, kinda expected this sort of thing from 2009, though
Rayancohenxo: that's actually pretty common in game development, just didn't expect Valve to be so... blatant about it
Ember Wolf: i'm shocked they'd resort to a leak just to skirt esrb guidelines, that's not exactly subtle