Diegomarsh: whoa what evidence is this guy talking about
Neon Serpent: sounds like more hearsay than hard fact to me
Jonas: it's interesting how politicians' past actions are being scrutinized now, but wasn't that always supposed to be part of the vetting process?
Jonas: what's the reasoning behind claiming a past situation as an issue now?
Arlos: It sounds like a classic case of political mudslinging, with a dash of revisionist history. Has anyone checked the actual records from back then?
Brunon: this whole thing reeks of scapegoating - can't be this simple